Stockholm 2003 abstracts: Hasselhorn HM et al.

Hasselhorn HM(1), Josephson M(2), Lindberg P(2), Tackenberg P(3), Mueller BH(3) and the NEXT-Study Group

(1) Department of Occupational Medicine, University of Wuppertal, Germany (2) Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden (3) Department of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, University of Wuppertal, Germany

Intent to leave nursing among nurses in Europe – First results from the European NEXT-STUDY

Introduction: The provision of a sufficiently large pool of nurses will be a major challenge for health policy in the future. The problem of lack of nurses in Europe is well known. In several countries, decreasing interest in nursing education among young school leavers can be observed (e.g. Germany, Austria, Poland, Slovakia). Migration of nurses within Europe is prevalent but will not solve the problem. Most nurses in Europe leave their profession long before reaching retirement age.

The longitudinal NEXT-Study (Nurses – Early Exit Study, www.next-study.net) investigates the reasons for and the circumstances of premature departure from nursing in Europe. The study design bases on questionnaire assessments of nurses, special assessments of leaving nurses and check lists of the participating institutions. The NEXT-Study is being financed by the European Union and lasts from February 2002 until November 2004. So far, more than 28.500 self report questionnaires have been collected from nurses working in 378 institutions in 7 of the ten participating countries.

Results: Preliminary results show that between 4 and 13% of the European nursing profession considers leaving their profession weekly or more often. A gradient from north (less often) to south (more often) was observed. German preliminary data (n=3535) indicates that intent to leave was associated with high qualification level and with young age. In multivariate analysis “intent to leave” was strongly associated with “work-family conflict” (in all age groups), with “no challenging work” and to low degree with high physical work load (in older age groups). A differentiated analysis of the European data will be presented.

Conclusions: Our preliminary results from the German assessment indicate that especially highly qualified nurses have the highest �intent to leave nursing�. Taking a) the demographic change, and b) the decreasing interest in nursing education among young school leavers into account, our observations indicate a severe threat for future assurance of health care for all. However, to implement preventive action in institutions, a differentiated analysis is necessary which also includes organisational aspects. Furthermore, it must be assessed whether “intent to leave nursing” is associated with “actual departure” out of the profession. This will be the case in the European NEXT-Study.

Stockholm 2003 abstracts: J. Lethbridge

Jane Lethbridge

Senior Research Fellow
Public Service International Research Unit
PSIRU- CMS, University of Greenwich
Park Row
London SE10 9LS
+44 8331 7781

Social and economic destabilisation in Europe: implications for health

Abstract

This paper will examine how public (health) sector unions are responding to changes caused by deregulation. Some of these changes – the impact of EU internal market legislation on national health systems, reform of national health systems, introduction of contracting, public-private partnerships – are introducing a form of commercialisation to the public health care system but are not yet leading to full privatisation. These present direct challenges to health workers in terms of pay, terms and conditions but also raise questions about accessibility of health care services for many disadvantaged groups. Some of the trade union responses are aimed at preserving terms and conditions but trade unions are increasingly forming alliances with other civil society groups to develop joint campaigns to preserve both user and workers rights.

These campaigns are also raising questions for trade unions about future health care policy and how to develop health care systems that address both the needs of the users and health workers. However the process of bringing trade unions and civil society organisations together is not an easy one. In some countries these alliances have not developed, in others the progress has been slow. There are underlying tensions between health workers and users of services, which are not easily resolved. The growing influence of users of health services (often with a focus on individual rather than collective needs) within health care systems requires new systems of participation and accountability to address these underlying conflicts. The challenges of deregulation and privatisation make the need to resolve these differences and develop long term strategic alliances which encompass a vision of a public health sector more urgent.

Stockholm 2003 abstracts: Ida Hellander (USA)

da Hellander, MD
PNHP Executive Director

Corporate Health Care Begets Fraud: Recent US Experience

ABSTRACT: Many countries are currently engaged in debates over the privatization of their health systems. Privatization is advocated by the IMF and World Bank way of decreasing government expenditures on health and improving efficiency, despite much evidence to the contrary. Previous research on the U.S. market-based health system, much of it by Harvard-based researchers Drs. David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, has shown that U.S. public spending on health care is the highest in the world despite a lack of access to care for over 40 million persons.

Also, for-profit hospitals, HMO�s, nursing homes, and dialysis facilities are of both higher cost and lower quality than their not-for-profit counterparts. Less well known is that the period after the failure of the Clinton health plan in the U.S. in 1994 was characterized by a frenzy of mergers among health care corporations – pharmaceutical firms, insurers/HMOs and hospitals. Since then, a wave of corporate fraud of “Enron-like” proportions has swept the health care industry. The two largest hospital chains � Tenet and Columbia/HCA have paid fines and penalties over $2 billion for defrauding Medicare. Drug companies have been convicted and fined for illegally preventing generic competition, defrauding the Medicaid program, and paying bribes and kickbacks to pharmacies and doctors to prescribe their products. A recent and massive case of fraud in the corporate health sector is HealthSouth, a chain of for-profit rehabilitation hospitals and laboratories. HealthSouth’s founder and CEO, Richard Scrushy, inflated the firm�s profits by over $2.5 billion to bilk investors and the government. Nine HealthSouth executives have already pleaded guilty to securities fraud. Countries considering privatization of any health services – even laboratories – have much to learn (and avoid) from the U.S. example that corporate health care begets fraud.

13th IAHPEurope Conference – Stockholm 2003

13th IAHPEurope Conference

Social and economic destabilisation in Europe: implications for health

Wednesday 21st May to Saturday 24th May 2003
Stockholm Sweden

The National Institute of Public Health

The conference will debate questions like 

What are the likely impacts of flexibility, deregulation and fragmentation in working conditions and relationships on health?

Including:

the impact of public health service reforms and privatisation on the health of health service workers,

the health impact of the new service industries

the impact of migration on health

To what extent do current changes in health and social policy challenge social solidarity?

What social factors or political forces are promoting social and economic stabilisation, and health? How can they be strengthened?

request for further details or fax 0044-207-830-2339

UPMRC update about the detention of health workers

UPMRC Update: Monday 19th May 2003

Further to our recent appeal, we are pleased to announce the release of Mr Nasaif Al Dik (Coordinator of Community Health Projects), Shadi Abu Bakr and Ahmed Badwan (Medical Relief Volunteers). All were arrested whilst in their homes along with Dr Mohammed Skafi (Head of Emergency Services and First Aid). Dr Skafi was released on the 7th of May.

We would like to thank the international community for their great efforts in demanding the release of the medical personnel. They may now return to their essential humanitarian work.

original appeal

Stockholm 2003: Health sector reform in Palestine

Motasem HAMDAN


1) Centre for Health Services and Nursing
Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

2) School of Public
Health, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem.
13th IAHPEurope Conference “Social and economic destabilisation in Europe: implications for health”

May 21st to24th 2003, Stockholm, Sweden

Health workforce in political and economic destabilisation: the interaction between health sector reform and human resources development in Palestine

UPMRC: Appeal for release medical personel

Palestinian Medical Relief
UPMRC

Sender: upmrc

URGENT APPEAL UPDATE

Release Medical Personel
Wednesday 7th May 2003

Following on from our recent appeal regarding Israeli occupying army attacks on two medical relief clinics and training centers in Nablus and Ramallah, and the arrest of Dr Mohammed Skafi (Head of Emergency Services and First Aid), Mr Nasaif Al Dik (Coordinator of Community Health Projects) Shadi Abu Bakr and Ahmed Badwan (medical relief volunteers), we are pleased to announce the release of Dr Mohammed Skafi.

Thanks to the good efforts of the international community, Dr Skafi was released on Monday the 5th of May at 5.00 pm, after being held at a detention center at the Beit El settlement. Dr Skafi was released without charge and did not endure any interrogation procedures.

However, Shadi Abu Bakr remains in the detention center at Beit El settlement. The Israeli army has refused to release him and has prevented his Lawyer from meeting with him. Mr Nasaif Al Dik and Ahmed Badwan are also still being held at a detention center at Petah Tikva. The Israeli army has refused to allow Lawyers to meet with them too. In addition, equipment stolen from the medical relief clinics and training centers has not been returned.

We call upon all humanitarian, human rights and health organizations to apply immediate pressure on the Israeli army and the Israeli government to release the remaining prisoners so that they may return to their essential humanitarian work. Please also demand that all stolen equipment must be returned to the medical centers immediately. Please protest to the following:

Ariel Sharon, Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister
3 Kaplan Street, P O Box 187
Jerusalem 91919, Israel
Fax: +972 2 6705475 E-mail: rohm@pmo.gov.il

Elyakim Rubinstein
Attorney-General/Legal Advisor to the Government
Ministry of Justice
9 Salah al-Din Street
Jerusalem 91010, Israel Fax: +972 2 6285438

Shaul Mofaz
Minister of Defence
Kaplan St.
Hakirya Tel-Aviv 61909
Tel: 972-3-5692010 Fax: 972-3-6916940

Foundation hospitals will kill the NHS, by A. Pollock

Foundation hospitals will kill the NHS
Don’t be fooled by the rhetoric: this is about privatisation

Allyson Pollock
Wednesday May 7, 2003
The Guardian

At its launch, Alan Milburn described the foundation hospitals bill as “true to our traditions of solidarity, community and fairness”. The Labour party chairman, Ian McCartney, even called it leftwing. But this did not satisfy Labour stalwarts: 130 backbench Labour MPs signed a motion opposing the bill because of fears about privatisation, an anxiety echoed by many outside parliament, including the British Medical Association and the Royal College of Nursing.

So now the media are being fed another story. The foundation proposal, we are being told, is only rhetoric; in reality, the reform changes nothing very much. Foundation hospitals will not be businesses but not-for-profit “mutuals”, NHS pay rates will apply and private practice will be capped. New Labour is simply tweaking some hoary NHS institutions while spinning the changes to undermine the Conservatives.

Downsizing of acute beds & privatisation

Downsizing of acute inpatient beds associated with private finance initiative: Scotland’s case study

Matthew G Dunnigan, senior research fellow,
Allyson M Pollock, professor

a University Department of Human Nutrition, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, b Public Health Policy Unit, School of Public Policy, University College London, London WC1H 9QU

Correspondence to: A M Pollock

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether the projected 24% reduction in acute bed numbers in Lothian hospitals, which formed part of the private finance initiative (PFI) plans for the replacement Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, is being compensated for by improvements in efficiency and greater use of community facilities, and to ascertain whether there is an independent PFI effect by comparing clinical activity and performance in acute specialties in Lothian hospitals with other NHS hospitals in Scotland.

Baghdad Central Infectious Disease Laboratory looted!

PHM reporting
Tuesday 15 April

Just reported from Baghdad on Abu-Dhabi Satellite Television News (6pm Londontime)

The Central Infectious Diseases Laboratory in the heart of Baghdad has been broken into, looted and smashed. Incubators containing many dangerous viruses, including hepatitis, polio, AIDS and many other have been stolen and other containers and incubators have been smashed and strewn all over the area.

There is no public broadcasting service to warn the looters and others of the dangers, and no authorities to take action. Some of the Lab workers have been pleading with ICRC officials and with American military medics to rise up to their responsibilities, but they appear to have been stonewalled. They believe that this will cause major outbreaks of disease.

Please act urgently. Contact the ICRC, aid agencies, media, politicians. This war is turning into genocide while politicians and the military congratulate each other. The Lab workers themselves stress that the diseases will not spare the occupation troops themselves.

Dr Kamil Mahdi