Baghdad Central Infectious Disease Laboratory looted!

PHM reporting
Tuesday 15 April

Just reported from Baghdad on Abu-Dhabi Satellite Television News (6pm Londontime)

The Central Infectious Diseases Laboratory in the heart of Baghdad has been broken into, looted and smashed. Incubators containing many dangerous viruses, including hepatitis, polio, AIDS and many other have been stolen and other containers and incubators have been smashed and strewn all over the area.

There is no public broadcasting service to warn the looters and others of the dangers, and no authorities to take action. Some of the Lab workers have been pleading with ICRC officials and with American military medics to rise up to their responsibilities, but they appear to have been stonewalled. They believe that this will cause major outbreaks of disease.

Please act urgently. Contact the ICRC, aid agencies, media, politicians. This war is turning into genocide while politicians and the military congratulate each other. The Lab workers themselves stress that the diseases will not spare the occupation troops themselves.

Dr Kamil Mahdi

British soldiers face jail for refusing to fight in Iraq

Two British soldiers are facing a court martial after refusing to fight in the war against Iraq for moral reasons. The men, both from 16 Air Assault Brigade, have been sent home and face up to two years in jail for disobeying orders.

A third serviceman, a reservist who refused to travel to the Gulf despite orders, may also face legal action.

Read More in: Article in Scotland on Sunday

But he found no trace of the depleted uranium (DU) some scientists believe is implicated in Gulf War syndrome.

Other researchers suggest new types of radioactive weapons may have been used in Afghanistan.

The scientist is Dr Asaf Durakovic, of the Uranium Medical Research Center (UMRC) based in Washington DC.

Dr Durakovic, a former US army colonel who is now a professor of medicine, said in 2000 he had found “significant” DU levels in two-thirds of the 17 Gulf veterans he had tested.

In May 2002 he sent a team to Afghanistan to interview and examine civilians there.

The UMRC says: “Independent monitoring of the weapon types and delivery systems indicate that radioactive, toxic uranium alloys and hard-target uranium warheads were being used by the coalition forces.”

Read more at BBC article

Public Health in S.Africa, 24-26 March 2003

Public Health 2003
24 – 26 March 2003
Cape Town, S. Africa

The new Public Health Association of South Africa is organising this conference gathering all the leading academics, colleagues and organisations of S. Africa committed to the development of the urgently needed human capacity in Public Health.

The conference seeks to influence the Public Health Agenda in South Africa through presentations, discussions and workshops on key public health topics. It will provide a forum for exchange between local and international public health practitioners and scientists.
The conference will also provide a platform for the launch of the new Public Health Association of South Africa (PHASA), which replaces ESSA.

click here for more information

Manifiesto Contra la Guerra “Primum non nocere”

Como profesionales de la salud, asistimos con alarma a los preparativos para el ataque que Estados Unidos se dispone a desencadenar contra Iraq, con la ayuda del gobierno inglιs y el apoyo de la UE.

Como ejercientes de una profesion cuya razσn de ser es mejorar la salud y preservar, en lo posible, a los seres humanos de la enfermedad y la muerte, no podemos permanecer impasibles ante esa forma de entender las relaciones internacionales.

Una de las herencias mαs vergonzosas que arrastramos del pasado siglo XX es la apariciσn de una nueva forma de guerra, caracterizadas por la desproporciσn de fuerzas entre atacantes y atacados, el uso ofensivo de armas de destrucciσn masiva, los daρos medioambientales, el elevado nϊmero de vνctimas producidas entre la poblaciσn civil, y el masivo flujo de refugiados. Ejemplos recientes de ιsta clase de desastres humanitarios son los que hemos conocido en Iraq, Yugoslavia o Afganistαn.

Es ahora, cuando ya no existe el enfrentamiento entre las superpontencias que dominσ el ϊltimo medio siglo, cuando asistimos a la mayor escalada militar de la historia, protagonizada por un solo gobierno que se ha arrogado el papel de gendarme mundial, legislador, juez y parte en aquellos asuntos que sus autoridades decidan como de “interιs nacional”. Hasta ahora, ιste “interιs nacional” del gobierno norteamericano ha sido asegurarse el suministro de petrσleo y demαs materias primas. Sin cambiar de objetivo , desde el 11 de Septiembre, EEUU usa la “Lucha contra el Terror” y la “Guerra Preventiva” como bandera bajo la que se han alineado la mayorνa de los gobiernos europeos para perseguir, bombardear e invadir a los unilateralmente calificados como Estados Terroristas.

Esta dinαmica belicista ha dejado y dejarα un rastro de destrucciσn y muerte, tanto por las vνctimas directas de la guerra, como por el impacto que el armamento usado ha tenido, y tendrα durante generaciones en la salud de las personas y de los ecosistemas, sσlo hay que recordar Hiroshima, Vietnam, Afganistαn e Iraq. Nunca conoceremos con exactitud el armamento utilizado en las guerras contra Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afganistαn o Palestina, ya que buena parte del mismo ha sido radiactivo, biolσgico y quνmico, expresamente prohibido por el Derecho Internacional. En el caso de Iraq, y sin contar con las vνctimas directas de la guerra del 91, el embargo ha causado la pιrdida de mαs de un millσn de seres humanos, mαs de la mitad infantiles. Ιsto en un paνs que, hasta entonces, incluso con Sadam Hussein, disfrutσ de una de los mejores sistemas de salud de

su entorno, con cifras comparables a las de los paνses occidentales en mortalidad infantil y esperanza de vida. Sin duda ιste nuevo conflicto, una invasiσn, aρadirα mαs muertos, dolor y sufrimiento a la poblaciσn del paνs.

Por otra parte, desde los paνses cuyos gobiernos emprenden ιsta carrera militar, es nuestro deber denunciar tanto ιsta onerosa escalada militar, como la instauraciσn de unas economνas dependientes hasta en un 50 % de actividades relacionadas con el desarrollo, producciσn y destrucciσn de armamento. Paradσjicamente, es en ιstos mismos paνses donde los dirigentes se niegan a invertir en servicios pϊblicos de salud. Es mαs, en las ϊltimas dιcadas estamos asistiendo al desmantelamiento de los Estados de Bienestar, y a la privatizaciσn de los Servicios Pϊblicos de Salud de la UE, justificados hipσcritamente por ser una “excesiva carga” para los presupuestos pϊblicos. Es desgraciadamente aleccionador que Estados Unidos derroche dinero en la guerra cuando no garantiza la asistencia sanitaria a su poblaciσn.

Por todo ello, nosotros, herederos de una antigua tradiciσn de respeto a la vida, y apostando por la instauraciσn de formas de convivencia pacνfica entre las naciones, rechazamos el recurso a la guerra. Exigiendo por ello el fin de todas acciones de guerra sobre Iraq, ( embargo, zonas de exclusiσn y bombardeos ) y sobre Palestina ( ocupada por Israel ).

Manifiesto de profesionales de la salud Contra la Guerra

“Primum non nocere”

Nombre
Firma
Profesiσn

US Physicians for a National Health Program

Dear PNHP physicians, medical students and far-flung friends,

A new bill for single payer will be introduced in Congress on Tuesday, February 4 (press release to follow).

We thank all the members of the Physicians Working Group for Single Payer for all their hard work on this project, as well as Rep. John Conyers, a lifelong advocate in the Congress for health and human rights, and his staffer, Joel Segal.

There are three things you can do to help in the coming weeks.

1) Contact your member of Congress and encourage them to be a co-sponsor of this legislation. If they sign on today, they can still be an “original” co-sponsor and their name will be permanently attached to the bill. The Congressional switchboard is (202) 224-3121.

2) Encourage physicians and medical students to individually endorse the “Physicians and Medical Students Proposal for NHI” If you have access to any e-mail lists at your hospital, medical school, etc. please circulate the summary and endorsement form.

3) Encourage any civic, consumer, church, or other grassroots or allied professional groups you belong to to endorse the new single-payer bill. A new web site, Coalition for a National Health Program is being constructed to keep an ongoing list of endorsements. Please bookmark it.

Thank you for your continued support. Although the war and the shuttle disaster are making headlines, we hope to offer the press some good news to cover as well.

Ida Hellander, MD
Executive Director
Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP)
29 E Madison, Suite 602
Chicago, IL 60602
312.782.6006
fax 312.782.6007
pnhp e-mail

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 3, 2003
11:00 a.m

Physicians Propose Solution to Rising Health Care Costs and Uninsured
Introduce National Health Insurance Bill in Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A group of the nation’s most prominent physicians and progressive leaders of Congress will hold a press conference briefing Tuesday, February 4, 11am, 2226 Rayburn House Office Building, to unveil a new bill, The United States National Health Insurance Act, a single-payer national health program. The legislation proposes an effective mechanism for controlling skyrocketing health costs while covering all 42 million uninsured Americans. The bill also restores free choice of physician to patients and provides comprehensive prescription drug coverage to seniors, as well as
younger people.

“Good news,” says Dr. Quentin Young, convener of the physician panel. “There is now a way to exit the nightmare of a collapsing health system. We no longer have to put up with the outrageous costs that keep millions of Americans from receiving medical care and needed medications. Nor will tens of thousands of families have to declare bankruptcy over medical bills.

Universal national health insurance (single payer) takes the resources we have in place and deals with them in an intelligent manner, excluding the tragic hemorrhage of resources into non-health entities”.

Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine*, is the spokesperson for the Physicians Working Group on Single-Payer National Health Insurance, an ad-hoc collaboration of the nation’s top physicians. Dr. Angell will present the proposal at the briefing.

Other members of the group include Dr. Gerald Thomson and Dr. Christine Cassel, former Presidents of the American College of Physicians, the second largest medical association in the country; Dr. Rodney Hood and Dr. Gary Dennis, former Presidents of the National Medical Association; Dr. Elinor Christiansen, immediate Past-President of the American Medical Women’s Association; and Dr. Ron Anderson, CEO of Parkland Hospital in Dallas, Texas.

(*Affiliations for identification only. A full list of Working Group members is at the end of this release).

Representative John Conyers, Dean of the Congressional Black Caucus and ranking minority Member of the House Judiciary Committee will introduce The United States National Health Insurance Act on February 4. A long time advocate of national health insurance, Rep. Conyers closely collaborated with the Physicians Working Group on the bill.

Additionally, nearly 4,000 individual physicians have endorsed the physicians’ proposal including two former Surgeons General (Dr. David Satcher and Dr. Julius Richmond); a Nobel Laureate (Dr. Bernard Lown); the highly respected authors of major textbooks of surgery and family practice (Dr. William Silen and Dr. Robert Rakel, respectively); and a leading organizer of emergency services in NYC on 9/11(Dr. Lewis Goldfrank, Chairman of Emergency Medicine at New York University).

Also joining the physicians and Congressmen to endorse the National Health Insurance Act will be Dr. Maya Rockeymoore, Urban League Director of Health Policy; Dean Baker, Co-Director, Center for Economic and Policy Research; and Hillary Shelton, a spokesperson for Julian Bond, Chairman of the NAACP.

Original Congressional co-sponsors of the NHI bill at press time are:

Luis Guitierrez (IL), Jim McDermott (WA); Bobby Scott (VA); Donna Christensen (Virgin Islands); Barbara Lee (CA); Danny Davis (IL); Major Owens (NY); Jesse Jackson Jr.(IL); Maurice Hinchey (NY); Donald Payne (NJ); Elijah Cummings (MD); Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI); Alcee Hastings (FL); Chaka Fattah (PA); Ed Towns (NY); John Lewis (GA); BennieThompson (MS); Eleanor Holmes-Norton (delegate for DC), and Lou Grijalva (AZ) (listing in formation).

National Health Insurance Act Press Conference
February 4, 2003 11am
2226 Rayburn House Office Building, Judiciary Committee Room

*Physician Working Group Members

Marcia Angell, MD
Spokesperson
Past Editor
New England Journal of Medicine

Quentin Young, MD
Convener
National Coordinator PNHP
Former President American Public Health Association

Joel Alpert, MD
Former President
American Academy of Pediatrics

Ron Anderson, MD
President and CEO
Parkland Health &Hospital System

Peter Beilenson, MD, MPH
Commissioner
Department of Health, Baltimore

Christine Cassell, MD
Former President
American College of Physicians
Dean, Oregon University School of Medicine

Elinor Christiansen, MD
Past President
American Medical Women’s
Association

Olveen Carrasquillo, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Columbia School of Medicine
Advisory Committee Member
National Hispanic Medical Assn.
Gary Dennis, MD
Former President
National Medical Association

David Himmelstein, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Co-Founder, Physicians for a National Health Program

Rodney Hood, MD
Past President of the National Medical Association which represents
African-American physicians

Edith Rasell, MD, PhD
Minister for Labor Relations in Community and Economic Development for
the United Church of Christ

Helen Rodriguez-Trias, MD
Past President
American Public Health Association
(recently deceased)

Sindhu Srinivas, MD
Past President
American Medical Student Assn.

Gerald Thomson, MD
Former President
American College of Physicians

Walter Tsou, MD, MPH
Former Commissioner of Health,
Philadelphia

Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH
Associate Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School

Stop the War on Iraq!

International People’s Health Council

ALAMES – Asociacion Latinoamericana de Medicina Social

Joint statement by the organizers of the HEALTH FORUM (2nd International Forum for the Advocacy of People’s Health as an Essential Human Need)
Porto Alegre, Brazil: 25th January 2003

STOP THE WAR on Iraq !

“A war on Iraq will lead to a health and humanitarian crisis. It is disastrous for the people of the world”.

(An unanimous statement issued and signed by the participants of the 2nd Health Forum, held at Porto Alegre, Brazil (20th to 22nd January 2003)

We, the participants at the 2nd Health Forum at Porto Alegre, Brazil are greatly alarmed by and unequivocally condemn, the preparations for a full-blown war against Iraq currently being undertaken by the United States of America and United Kingdom.

This forum unanimously warns the Bush and Tony Blair administrations that the consequences of a war on Iraq is disastrous for the health and lives of the people of Iraq, its neighbouring countries and the rest of the world. We urge the two governments to put public interest and peace before their military and private commercial interests. The war plans are impermissible, undemocratic and immoral. It must be stopped.

Testimonies by health and humanitarian workers, public health professionals and others who are assembled here (including some who often provide front-line medical, health and humanitarian assistance during war, conflict and humanitarian situations) who are present here, for this international forum reminds that more than 90 % of the casualties in any war are innocent civilians. All wars destabilise the already over burdened health systems. Case of Iraq will no way be different. The Health Forum endorses the observations made by the MEDACT (a constituent of the People’s health Movement) and the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War in their recent scientific report about the potential health and humanitarian consequences of the proposed war.

The 12 year embargo and trade sanctions have killed thousands Iraqi people and unmitigated hardships to the ordinary civilians in Iraq. It has also crippled the economy and devastated public life, leaving millions of children malnourished and reversing the health standards.

The war will also lead to a wider regional conflict in the Middle East that will have long-term devastating health, humanitarian, social, economic and political consequences. What we need to leave for the next generation is not a sense of death and destruction, but of peace, solidarity, non-violence and understanding. We need to work towards a just and peaceful world, which is not only possible, but also necessary.

We extend our solidarity for the ongoing efforts by the peace and other social movements to stop this war. We appeal to the people of the world to join us in condemning all expressions of military terrorism and war. In today’s context of an advanced development of weapons of mass destruction, life is too precious to bear the burden of war.

Vital statistics (Iraq and Health):

3,900,000 deaths if nuclear weapons are used www.TheMillionSignatureCampaign.org

WHO-DG to lead defence of health as a social right

WHO Director general elections debate
The Lancet; Volume 361, Number 9354 25 January 2003

To lead the defense of health as a social right

Alexis Benos
President of the International Association of Health Policy
Medical Dept, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

“The World Health Organisation’s mandate is to get the evidence right and ensure that is properly used to make the world a healthier place”(1). The new WHO Director-General, in initiating a crucially needed change in the policies of the leading international health agency, could use this statement that Gro Harlem Brundtland made in her message introducing the World Health Report 2002. In fact the content of the World Health Report 2002 recognises widening international health inequalities and acknowledges, albeit not overtly, their socio-economic determinants in focusing on poverty.

This is a substantial change in WHO’s approach to international health issues, especially when compared with the severely criticised approach of the World Health Report 2000(2). Any optimism that this marks a fundamental shift in WHO’s perspective is unfortunately contradicted by the recommendations of the WHR 2002 that focus on individual behavior and unhealthy choices, while neglecting the determining role of the globalised market economy. The accumulating evidence on social inequalities in health worldwide poses a substantial challenge for the new WHO leadership. The burden of health disparities, from the tragedy of the sub-Saharan African populations to the widening marginalisation of populations in Latin America and the developed and former socialist countries is already unbearable. The global division between rich and poor is not merely a topic of scientific interest. It is a key health policy issue, as its impact on the health status of the world population cannot be disregarded anymore. The reality, recognized by the World Health Report 2002, is that “the greatest burden of health risks is borne by the poor countries and by the disadvantaged in all societies”(1). The fact that the risk factors resulting in most of the global disease burden, viz. malnutrition, unsafe water and sanitation, unsafe sex and indoor air pollution are significantly determined by the socioeconomic policies1 can not be dealt with by a mere appeal for healthier lifestyles. Concrete actions and policies to create a more equitable society are urgently needed. Health and its socioeconomic determinants have to assume a higher priority in international and national policies with strong support and advocacy by the new WHO leadership. Regarding health care policies: “the conventional wisdom which promotes managed competition and privatization in the management and delivery of health services”(2) is still the driving approach in the international setting, including WHO. Here again there is accumulating evidence that, besides the overt public funding of for profit private corprorations(3), none of the anticipated targets of this policy is being achieved. To the contrary the picture is more of: budget deficits exploding under the pressure of debts to private companies(4), deregulated services, shortages of human resources, collapsing public health services and a constant increase in numbers of people denied any access to health care services. On the winners side there has been a geometric growth of private sector profits based on the promotion health commodification(5). These are the results of the implementation of the economic policy that the World Trade Organisation is promoting globally through the GATS (the General Agreement on Trade in Services) and TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property) agreements. The new WHO leadership, in advocating for the defense of health and health care as a social right, has the duty to stand up against these devastating policies and consider seriously messages from the growing international movement, some of which is currently gathered at the World Social Forum in Porto Allegre. Millions of desperate people, their governments and health workers all around the world expect and deserve a substantial backing from WHO in their struggle for health and a better world.

References
1. Gro Harlem Brundtland. Message from the Director -General. World health Report 2002, World health Organisation 2002, Geneva.
2. Navarro V. Can Health Care Systems be compared using a single measure of performance? Am J Public Health 2002, 92:1:31-34.
3. Gaffney D, Pollock A, Price D, Shaoul J. NHS capital expenditure and the private finance initiative -expansion or contraction? BMJ 1999; 319: 48-51. 5. Pollock A. A wake up call for primary care. Br J Gen Practice November 2002:883-884.

II International Forum Advocacy of Peoples’ Health

III World Social Forum: Another world is possible

II International Forum for the Advocacy of Peoples’ Health as an Essential Human Need, a Citizenship Right and a Public Good

Porto Alegre – RS – Brasil
January 20th – 23rd, 2003
Organization:
Asociación Latinoamericana de Medicina Social – ALAMES
International Peoples’ Health Council – IPHC
International Association of Health Policy – IAHP
Peoples’ Health Movement – PHM
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Saúde -CEBES
Secretaria Municipal de Saúde – SMS/PMPA
Prefeitura Municipal de Porto Alegre
Rede Brasileira de Cooperação em Emergências – RBCE
Subscription list is open for entities which want to act as organizers or supporters for the event.

Background:

Four hundred participants of the I International Forum for the Advocacy of Peoples’ Health, performed in Porto Alegre on January 2002, soon before the II World Social Forum (WSF), recommended the accomplishment of II International Forum for the Advocacy of Peoples’ Health preceding the III WSF in January 2003. This will allow a widened participation of all those interested, a preparation of the contributions on health issues for the III WSF, and, at the same time, to raise health theme to apower in the several activities within the WSF itself.
Conclusions of the I International Forum, attached to this letter, summarize the objective and the motivation for this II Forum, where we want to build an International Agenda on the Defense of the Health Right, as well as to launch the basis for an international call for the accomplishment of the I World Forum for the Advocacy of Health in Porto Alegre – Brazil, in the first semester of 2004.

Target public for this International Forum:

Social and political movements in general, concerned and/or active on people and collectivities’ right to health, such as Peasants’ Movement, Landless People Movement, Factory Workers, Services Workers, Teachers, Education Workers, Advocacy for Children and Adolescents, For Peace, Against Violence, Political Movements and Parties, Youth Movements, Ecological Movements, for Sanitation and Urban and Rural Development, for Free Sexual Option, for Public Security, for Safe Traffic, for Safe and Protector of Life Communities, Mental Health Movements, Student Movements in general, Journalists, Artists, Culture Workers, members of Religious Movements, Ethnical Movements, Afro and Indigenous People… that is, all those interested in establishing and fighting for an ANTI-NEOLIBERAL POLITICS, FOR THE ADVOCACY OF HEALTH AS A SOCIAL AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT, TASK OF THE STATE AND A PUBLIC GOOD.

Objectives of the II International Forum for the Defense of the Peoples’ Health:

  • To build and to spread an enlarged perception of health as an indispensable element for social justice in the world, perceiving health as a right and as na endowment for each citizen and each collectivity.
  • To accompplish a critical analysis, analysing alternatives and proposing ways to overcome neoliberal principles in health, making them known and making suitable the ways used by successful experiences in the affirmation of an universality of rights with the construction of social equity.
  • To introduce or strengthen the theme of right to health in the agendas of social movements in general and governments and to insert social movements in general in the fight for health, adopting its wide and definition of human need and quality of life, where every one will identify with a theme which does not belong only to specialists, but pertains to the universe of needs and desires of all human beings.
  • To produce spaces of reflexion through working groups whose participants belong to different movements, and which main objective or reason is not health, to share with their interlocutors this double construction. Its object for fight – be it the rights of indigenous peoples, children and adolescents, women, elderly, ethnical minorities, for sexual option, for access to land, for access to work, for access to housing, … or even more general fight movements, as political parties and movements, unions, peasants, students, teachers, community associations… can be seen in their specific themes as well as embracing the theme of right to health, under a perspective of participation in the building of an universal social right to health, as a human being, as a right of citizenship and as a public good.
  • To build a political agenda for construction and diffusion of a political reason and the universal right to health, with the definition of spaces for articulation between different political and social movements, as well as together with socially commited governments to generate answers to the needs of population.
  • To structure in a participatory way the Call and the organization of the program to the I World Forum for the Right to Health and in Advocacy of the peoples’ health in 2004 in Porto Alegre.
  • To facilitate the vision of health policies and systems which are not oriented by neoliberalism, making known and concrete the Unified health System – SUS – in Porto Alegre and in Rio Grande do Sul, under the context of building a national SUS, also bringing other Brazilian SUS experiences for knowledgement, stimulating this kind of focus and alternative agenda for those countries which face the challenges of building appropriate and social security and health systems according to the principle of health as an universal social right, a duty of the State and co-responsibility of society.
  • To establish universality with equity as a big concreteness of the right to health expressed in equity of health conditions, in access to services and in the distribution of resources and opportunities.
  • To adopt the promotional quality of life strategy, overcoming the mere assistencialism, guiding health care to another direction of individuals and their collectivities’s autonomy and establishing a transdisciplinar and transectorial relationship on quality of life and health.

Methodology of the Forum:

To build a general reference for the debate through Panels, ordering general questions to be answered and the existing positions in the field of analysis and proposals. To develop sessions in the form of Working Groups where organizations and particpants of different social movements will be able to present their positions about four questions:

  1. which is the focus of the agenda in your political and social movement and which is the space and characteristics of the presence of Health as a Right in your current Agenda?
  2. which are the characteristics that should be adopted by the fight for health, which is your agenda and which are the strategies to be successful in this fight? Which are the reference experiences in this field?
  3. which are the interests, opportunities and barriers to be overcome to introduce the health theme as a Social Right in the Agenda of different social movements and how could this movement engage itself in the more general fight for Health as a Social Right.
  4. how to structure and operate the call and the conducting of the I World Forum for the encourage the organization of regional and/or national preparatory Forums.

These questions will be developed in Working groups, according to the dynamics adopted by indicated Coordinators and the group itself, assuring the expression of all in their positions’s presentations and soon consolidating in the debate a collective position to be presented to the General Plenary at the end of each day. General recommendations and joint working goals – Political Integrated Agenda, will be adopted at the Final Session, based on reports and its final outcome.
After the II International Forum, during the 23rd of January, site visits and lectures about the Unified Health System will be organized allowing people to know Porto Alegre’s SUS. On subscription, those interested should express their theme preferences in order to know our SUS.

Program:

January 20th, 2003
8:00 AM – Participants ??????
8:30 AM – Official Opening Ceremony
9:00 AM – Panel of Analysis of the International Situation of Peoples’s Health, of States Reforms, of Social and Political Movements and the Right to Health, instituting a critical focus on advances and retrocedings in the warranty of the right to health, situating health theme under the context of political agendas of governments and society. This Panel will try to trace a comprising view, covering all regions of the planet.
11:00 AM – Debate with the audience
12:30 – Lunch
2 PM – Working Groups, discussing about the two initial questions
5:00 PM – Information and Analysis about Social and Political Experience of SUS – Unified health System – in Brazil. Elements to Understand Porto Alegre’s Experience.
6:30 PM – Presentation of discussions in each Group of themes 1 and 2.
7:00 PM – Artistic acitivities
7:30 PM – Closing of the day

January 22nd, 2003

8:30 AM – Panel about alternatives for the development of health agendas in the scope of local / department / state / and national governments of social movements in general and in the form of these governments and movements to sum to for the building of a Political Agenda in Defense of Health as a Social Right. The role of international cooperation, North-South and South-South. Examples of success in the definition and development of social agendas in defense of the right to health. Discussion.
11:00 AM – Discussions with the audience
12:30 – Lunch
2:00 PM – Working Groups, themes 2 and 3
5:00 PM – Planary session: Synthesis of the recommendations of groups and discussion about how to ???????? this fight around an International Agenda for Defense of Health as a Social Right. Preliminary composition of recommendations and organization of actions for the Agenda in Defense of the Right to Health.
6:30 PM – Closing of the day’s activities
8:30 PM – Dinner for the Health of People, by adhesion

January 23rd, 2003
9:00 AM – Panel with a report of experience of organization and mobilization of the Assembly for the Health of the People in Bangladesh, of the World Social Forums and the World Education Forums, reports of other experiences of international mobilization. Reflexion about the role of events in the political mobilization. Initial ordering of an agenda of themes and initiatives which will take us to the organization of a I World Forum for the Right of health in 2004.
11:00 AM – Discussion with the audience
12:30 – Lunch
2:00 PM – ?????, theme 4. Conclusions and recommendations of each Group.
4:30 PM – Final Plenary Session: Approval of the Final report with the observations and recommendations of the event and with the proposal of a general program and strategies for the call and structure of organization for the I World Forum for the Right to Health. Definition of communication strategies about the theme Health and the conclusions of this II International Forum within the III World Social Forum. Approval of the International Agenda for the Advocacy of the Right to Health.
6:30 PM – Official closing of the II Forum.
9:30 PM – Party

January 23rd, 2003
9:00 AM to 4:00 PM
Optional activity post International Forum to visit and to know SUS – Unified Health System – in the city of Porto Alegre in sectors where the participants are interested on.

Information and Subscriptions:

Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Porto Alegre
Av. João Pessoa, 325 – centro – Porto Alegre – RS – Brazil
CEP 90040-000

Telephone: (+55) 51 3289 2833, 3289 2859, 3289 2850
Fax: (+55) 51 3289 2827, 3289 2841
E-mail: joser@sms.prefpoa.com.br armandon@portoweb.com.br, ananyr@sms.prefpoa.com.br
alames@movinet.com.uy

On behalf of the Organizing Committee:
Armando De Negri Filho
General Coordinator of the Latin American Association of Social Medicine – ALAMES

When you send you subscription, please inform:

Name, entity or movement you are a member of, explaining its field of activities, position, mail address for institutional mailing, telephone, fax and e-mail. Please indicate which is your field of interest for site visits in Porto Alegre.

Subscriptions and information by Internet:
For subscriptions for the II International Forum for the Defense of Peoples’ Health, use the mail: assepla@sms.prefpoa.com.br

Please pay attention to the subscription at the III World Social Forum and for the subscription of activities of your institution / organization (in this case, until December 6th, 2002): Subscription
e-mail

As well as through the mail:
fsm-hospedagem@smic.prefpoa.com.br information about hosting

Million Signatures on the Internet to demand “Health for all now”

Hyderabad (India), Savar (Bangladesh), Managua (Nicaragua), 5th January 2003:

PEOPLE’S HEALTH MOVEMENT and INTERNATIONAL PEOPLE’S HEALTH COUNCIL launches:

The Million Signature Campaign:

A march on the Internet demanding HEALTH FOR ALL NOW!

“In the next 24 hours, over 30,000 children will die from preventable diseases on our planet earth. Today, while the world is writing a collective obituary of the future generation, we know why they are dying; we know who are responsible for these deaths. We know how these deaths can be stopped… Join ‘The Million Signature Campaign’, – a march demanding health for all.”

These are not just statistics, but precious lives that the World Health Organisation promised to save 25 years ago. In 1978, World Health Organisation, the apex UN body dealing with health, promised Health for all by 2000 through a historic moment, the Alma Ata declaration.

“Since the Alma Ata declaration in 1978, responses were promising. However, the spirit of Alma Ata and the idea of Health For All has been under attack by anti-health, anti-poor policies, reemerging and new diseases, new challenges and above all by efforts to put private profit over public health. In the current international health crisis, it is more essential to reaffirm and implement the principles and strategies of Alma Ata” sayswww.themillionsignaturecampaign.org, the home page for this-web based campaign.

The Million Signature campaign was officially launched today simultaneously from Bangladesh, Nicaragua and India. Thousands of people participating in the Asian Social Forum at Hyderabad, India, are expected to extend their solidarity on the opening day of this web campaign. People’s Health Movement is at Asian Social Forum to extend the solidarity of the global health movement.

25 years since the Alma Ata declaration, health for all by 2000 is not a reality. This signature campaign, initiated by the People’s Health Movement and the International People’s Health Council, is being endorsed by ordinary people from various walks of life and organisations, institutions, people’s associations and others working for a just world.

Ms. Parven Akhter, a 22- years old health worker from Souther, a village located in the Faridpur district of Bangladesh is the first signatory. “Let us work together, make other people aware of their health rights and ensure basic health care for all. I hope everybody will join this campaign”, said Ms. Akter.

Some of the first signatories include ordinary health workers, former UN officials and architects of the Alma Ata declaration, medical professionals, journalists, writers, policy-makers, academics, Nobel Prize and Right Livelihood award (alternate Nobel prize) winners, ministers and former heads of nations, politicians, celebrities, leading organisations, students and mass movements.

“The campaign is conceptualised and designed to catch the attention of the WHO, UNICEF, other UN bodies, social and political organisations, policy-makers, governments and others. It is one more step towards making health for all a reality,” said Dr. Qasem Choudhury, the outgoing facilitator for the People’s Health movement
(PHM) secretariat. PHM was launched in Dec 2000 through the People’s Health Assembly, a historic summit in Bangaldesh that had participation of over 1500 representatives from nearly 100 countries. The goal of the People’s Health Movement is to re-establish health and equitable development as top priorities in local, national and international policy-making, with comprehensive primary health care as the strategy to achieve these priorities.

PHM aims to draw on and support people’s movements in their struggles to build long-term and sustainable solutions to health problems. One of the outcomes of the PHA 2000 is the People’s Charter for Health, the largest consensus document on health.

“Last 25 years have seen several experiments in the health sector. Some of them met with success in the initial stages. Of late, corporate and private interests have defeated public health. The negative impacts of unregulated globalisation and privatisation are neutralising the achievements we had in making health for all a reality,” said Ms.Maria Hamlin Zuniga, Co-ordinator of the International People’s Health Council (IPHC). IPHC, a constituent of the PHM, is a worldwide coalition of people’s health initiatives and progressive groups and movements committed to working for the health and rights of disadvantaged people. “Primary Health care works where there is a political commitment,” she said.

“People’s Health Movement will observe 2003 as the year of Alma Ata. A series of activities are being planned to remind and revive the key principles of Alma Ata,” said Dr. Ravi Narayan, the new facilitator for the PHM secretariat.

“The struggle for justice and health for all needs to be fought at different levels. We are aware of the digital divide. Concerted efforts will be put to take this campaign and spread the struggle for health for all also to people who are below the digital line. Using media apart from the Internet will be one of the methods to popularize this Internet based campaign,” said Dr. Unnikrishnan PV of IPHC, facilitator for this web-based campaign.

Dr. Qasem Choudhury, Outgoing facilitator: PHM secretariat
Maria Hamlin Zuniga, Co-ordinator: IPHC
Dr. Ravi Narayan, Facilitator: PHM Secretariat.

For further media queries, please call:

India : Dr. Unnikrishnan PV (Mobile: +91 (0) 98450 91319 / unnikru@yahoo.com)

Thailand: Satya Sivaraman (E-mail: satyasagar@yahoo.com)

UK: Andrew Chetley (E-mail: chetley.a@healthlink.org.uk)

During Asian Social Forum : +91 (0) 98450 91319 / +91 (0) 98491 55692